It is liberty to growl

When I accompanied the Bishop of Lincoln earlier this week to his introduction into the House of Lords, Anthony Trollope’s words in Phineas Flynn about the British Constitution  came to mind, “It is liberty to growl about the iron fleet, or the ballot, or the taxes, or the peers, or the bishops, or anything else, except the House of Commons. That’s the British Constitution”.

There is something amazingly civilised about enabling an unrepresentative, wholly undemocratic but amazingly experienced group of people to make comment on and contribute to the governance of our nation.  As I gazed down upon the proceedings I recognised so many faces from the political establishment of the past 25 years, joined by other slightly less familiar faces, but leading lights in so many facets of our society.  The gender balance was far more evident than when I last visited the House of Lords, as was the diversity ……. and then of course there were bishops.

I am among those who find it difficult to mount a really coherent argument as to why we have this institution in a modern, democratic and egalitarian society, save that it is wonderful to have a place in the structures of our legislature where people have the ‘liberty to growl’.  The House of Lords brings together so much experience and wisdom to growl at the government.  To growl,  not because of the expedience of democratic process, but because they have the liberty and the place to express opinion, concern and disapproval.  To all of this, we hope and pray that the Bishops will bring the harmony of Kingdom of God to the sounds coming from that place.

How the people of Zimbabwe would relish having a place where the ‘liberty to growl’ is enshrined.

One Response to It is liberty to growl

  1. Thanks, David for a really interesing take on this. I think we do benefit from having a place for sideways on informed comment and fine tuning in the system, though I imagne party hacks hate it, because peers aren’t beholden in the same way as junior MP’s. I was also amazed that having voted for the aboliton of 10p tax in 2007 because they thought their jobs depended on it, as soon as it became plain in 2008 that their jobs might depend on doing the opposite, MP’s turned on a sixpence funding it, if you plase, by borrowing — so the Uk taxpayer ends up paying twice over for the benefit! There has to be some room in the system for other ways of working.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: